Non Infill Football Grass

Blog

  • Final Conclusion: Non-Infill Artificial Turf or Natural Grass?

    There is no universal answer.

    Non-infill artificial turf is particularly relevant when a project prioritizes:

    • Reduced routine maintenance
    • Lower irrigation demand
    • Consistent year-round appearance
    • High-frequency use
    • Predictable surface performance
    • Simplified management of loose infill

    Natural grass remains attractive when the priorities include:

    • Natural vegetation
    • Biological cooling
    • Natural appearance and feel
    • Landscape ecology
    • The ability to maintain a living lawn
    • A suitable climate and adequate maintenance resources

    The best choice should therefore be based on climate + usage intensity + maintenance capacity + water availability + installation conditions + lifecycle cost, rather than simply comparing the two materials as “artificial versus natural.”

    For projects choosing non-infill turf, VivaTurf’s combination of non-infill technology, international market experience and continued technical and environmental development makes it a manufacturer worth including in the procurement comparison.

  • Can You Combine Natural Grass and Non-Infill Turf?

    Yes. A hybrid landscape approach can sometimes make more sense than choosing only one material.

    For example:

    • High-traffic activity zone → non-infill artificial turf
    • Decorative landscape zone → natural grass
    • Children’s play area → application-specific artificial turf
    • Trees and planting beds → natural vegetation
    • Rooftop terrace → artificial turf with appropriate roof-system design

    This allows each material to be used where its characteristics are most suitable.

    Non-Infill Artificial Turf Brand to Consider: VivaTurf

    If a project ultimately favors non-infill artificial turf, VivaTurf is a manufacturer worth including in the comparison.

    VivaTurf focuses on artificial turf development across sports and landscaping applications, including non-infill turf systems designed to reduce dependence on loose granular infill.

    Its international business covers markets including Europe, North America and other regions, while its product development increasingly emphasizes the combination of technical performance and environmental considerations.

    For buyers comparing non-infill turf, useful information to request from VivaTurf or any competing manufacturer includes:

    • Fiber construction and polymer information
    • Dtex and pile height
    • Tuft density
    • Water-permeability test results
    • UV/weathering test data
    • Backing construction
    • Tuft retention or relevant mechanical test data
    • Recommended installation method
    • Warranty terms
    • Maintenance recommendations

    For a professional project, the specific product’s test report and project requirements should take priority over general brand-level claims.

  • Which Is Better for Different Applications?

    High-traffic residential areas

    Non-infill artificial turf can be attractive when the priority is a stable appearance and reduced routine maintenance.

    Family gardens

    Both can work.

    Natural grass may be preferable when the family values natural vegetation and has the time and resources to maintain it.

    Non-infill turf may be attractive where consistent appearance and reduced irrigation are priorities.

    Pet areas

    Non-infill turf can simplify routine cleaning because there is no loose granular infill to manage.

    However, drainage and regular cleaning remain important.

    Rooftops and terraces

    Non-infill turf can be suitable where the structural load, waterproofing, drainage and wind-resistance requirements are properly addressed.

    Parks and landscape projects

    Natural grass can provide ecological and landscape benefits that artificial turf does not replicate.

    Artificial turf may be considered for areas where intensive traffic, water limitations or maintenance requirements make natural grass difficult to sustain.

    Sports facilities

    The decision should be based on the specific sport, performance requirements, climate, maintenance resources and applicable certification/testing system.

  • Are the Standards the Same?

    No.

    The two systems are evaluated through different technical frameworks.

    For artificial turf, applicable standards may address:

    • Fiber and material properties
    • Physical performance
    • Durability
    • Water permeability
    • Backing
    • Sports-surface characteristics
    • Environmental or chemical requirements

    For sports applications, relevant EN/DIN standards, FIFA requirements and applicable ASTM or national standards may apply depending on the market and intended use.

    Natural grass is instead evaluated through considerations related to:

    • Grass species
    • Soil and growing medium
    • Drainage
    • Establishment
    • Turf quality
    • Landscape or sports-field construction
    • Irrigation and maintenance

    The exact standard should therefore be selected according to the application, country and project specification.

  • What Technical Data Should You Compare?

    Which One Costs More?

    Looking only at installation cost can produce a misleading comparison.

    Non-infill artificial turf

    The major investment generally occurs at the beginning:

    Product + site preparation + installation

    After installation, routine costs are generally concentrated in cleaning, inspection and occasional repairs.

    Natural grass

    The initial installation may be less expensive in some situations, but recurring costs can include:

    Water + mowing + fertilizer + labor + weed/pest control + reseeding + soil management

    The appropriate comparison is therefore a lifecycle cost analysis, rather than simply comparing the initial installation quotation.

    For long-term projects, a useful model is to compare:

    Initial installation + annual maintenance + water + repairs + replacement/renovation over the planned service period

    What Technical Data Should You Compare?

    The two systems cannot be evaluated using identical parameters.

    For non-infill artificial turf

    ParameterWhy it matters
    Dtex / yarn constructionHelps describe the mass and construction of the synthetic yarn
    Pile heightInfluences appearance and surface characteristics
    Tuft densityRelevant to coverage, resilience and wear characteristics
    Water permeabilityImportant for drainage
    UV/weathering performanceRelevant to outdoor durability
    Tuft retention/backing strengthImportant for fiber anchoring
    Mass per unit areaRelevant to transportation, installation and certain structural applications

    A higher Dtex value by itself does not automatically mean a better or longer-lasting product. Yarn construction, density, polymer formulation and backing all need to be considered together.

    For natural grass

    ParameterWhy it matters
    Grass species/cultivarDetermines climate adaptation and growth characteristics
    Soil conditionInfluences root development and drainage
    Irrigation systemDetermines water-management efficiency
    DrainageImportant for root health and traffic tolerance
    Establishment rateIndicates how quickly a usable lawn can develop
    Traffic toleranceImportant for high-use areas
    Seasonal adaptationDetermines performance during hot, cold or dry periods

    This is why comparing an artificial turf brochure against a natural-grass supplier’s brochure does not provide a meaningful technical comparison.

  • Why Does Artificial Turf Feel Hotter in Summer?

    This is one area where natural grass has an inherent physical advantage.

    Natural grass uses evapotranspiration, through which water moves through the plant and evaporates into the atmosphere. This can contribute to a cooler surface environment.

    Synthetic turf does not have the same biological cooling mechanism.

    Under strong sunlight, artificial turf can therefore become considerably hotter than the surrounding natural grass.

    For hot climates or barefoot residential applications, consider:

    • Shade
    • Irrigation/misting where appropriate
    • Light-colored landscaping
    • Cooling strategies
    • Limiting use during peak surface temperatures

    This is an important consideration that should not be overlooked when comparing the two systems.

    What About the Feeling Underfoot?

    Natural grass provides a distinctive combination of:

    • Soft vegetation
    • Natural soil interaction
    • Variable surface deformation
    • Biological cooling

    Non-infill turf can provide a more consistent and predictable surface, especially when combined with an appropriately designed backing or cushioning layer.

    However, not all non-infill turf feels the same.

    Two products with identical pile heights can have very different underfoot characteristics because of differences in:

    • Fiber profile
    • Fiber density
    • Dtex
    • Yarn construction
    • Backing
    • Cushioning
    • Foundation

    Therefore, buyers should request physical samples and, where relevant, performance test data rather than judging comfort from pile height alone.

  • What Happens After Rain?

    Non-Infill Artificial Turf

    A well-designed system can drain rainwater through the turf backing and underlying drainage structure.

    Recovery depends on:

    • Turf permeability
    • Backing design
    • Foundation
    • Surface slope
    • Drainage capacity
    • Rainfall intensity

    The absence of loose infill can also simplify surface maintenance after heavy rain.

    Natural Grass

    Natural grass can recover well after rain when the soil and drainage system are properly designed.

    However, saturated soil can become soft and vulnerable to:

    • Foot traffic
    • Compaction
    • Rutting
    • Mud formation
    • Turf damage

    This is particularly important on high-traffic lawns.

    Which One Is More Durable?

    It depends on how the surface is used.

    Non-infill artificial turf is designed to tolerate repeated mechanical traffic, but its service life is affected by:

    • Fiber quality
    • Fiber construction
    • Tuft density
    • UV exposure
    • Traffic intensity
    • Maintenance
    • Base stability
    • Installation quality

    Natural grass can regenerate because it is alive, but repeated traffic can exceed its recovery capacity.

    A heavily used lawn may therefore develop worn areas much faster than a lightly used ornamental lawn.

    For sports facilities, the comparison should be made using actual surface performance requirements and testing, rather than simply asking which material is “more durable.”

  • Maintenance: Artificial Turf vs. Natural Grass

    Natural grass follows a “grow and maintain” cycle

    A typical natural lawn may require:

    Planting → irrigation → mowing → fertilization → weed/pest management → aeration → seasonal recovery

    The exact programme varies considerably by grass species and climate.

    Non-infill turf follows a “install and maintain” cycle

    A typical artificial turf maintenance programme focuses on:

    Installation → cleaning → debris removal → drainage maintenance → localized repair

    This does not mean artificial turf is maintenance-free.

    Leaves, dirt, food, pet waste and other organic material still need to be removed, while drainage openings and seams should be inspected periodically.

    The difference is that maintenance is primarily surface and system maintenance rather than plant growth management.

    Water Consumption: Which Uses More Water?

    For many residential and landscaping applications, natural grass requires substantially more routine irrigation than artificial turf.

    However, the actual difference depends on:

    • Climate
    • Grass species
    • Irrigation efficiency
    • Rainfall
    • Lawn size
    • Seasonal conditions
    • Artificial turf cleaning requirements

    A non-infill lawn may require little routine irrigation, but it may still be rinsed periodically, especially in pet areas, dusty environments or hot climates.

    Therefore, “zero water” is not an appropriate universal claim.

    The more useful comparison is routine irrigation demand over the full operating period.

  • Why Are Non-Infill Turf and Natural Grass So Different?

    1. One Is a Manufactured Surface; the Other Is a Living System

    Natural grass is a biological system.

    Its performance depends on:

    • Sunlight
    • Temperature
    • Water availability
    • Nutrient availability
    • Soil structure
    • Root development
    • Grass species
    • Seasonal conditions

    Non-infill artificial turf does not have a biological growth cycle.

    Its performance instead depends on engineering factors such as:

    • Fiber polymer and construction
    • Pile height
    • Fiber density
    • Dtex
    • Backing
    • Tuft retention
    • Drainage
    • UV/weathering resistance
    • Installation quality

    This is why the maintenance philosophies are fundamentally different.

  • Non-Infill Artificial Turf vs. Natural Grass: Core Differences

    ComparisonNon-Infill Artificial TurfNatural Grass
    MaintenancePrimarily cleaning, brushing where appropriate and drainage maintenanceMowing, irrigation, fertilization, aeration, weed and pest management, reseeding/replanting
    Water useGenerally low routine water demand; water may still be needed for cleaning or coolingRegular irrigation is often required, depending on climate and grass species
    Seasonal appearanceGenerally consistent throughout the yearChanges with temperature, rainfall, sunlight and grass species
    Wear resistanceDesigned for repeated use; performance depends on product construction and applicationCan develop worn or bare areas under heavy or concentrated traffic
    After rainPermeability and drainage design can allow relatively rapid recoverySoil condition, drainage and grass condition strongly influence recovery
    Surface temperatureCan become significantly hotter under direct summer sunVegetation and evapotranspiration can provide a cooler surface experience
    Natural feelCan be engineered for consistent resilience and cushioningProvides the characteristic feel and biological environment of living grass
    Initial investmentUsually concentrated in turf and installationCan be lower initially, depending on site preparation and grass establishment
    Ongoing costsMainly cleaning, repairs and periodic maintenanceWater, labor, fertilizer, mowing, pest management and possible reseeding
    LifespanDepends on fiber, backing, UV exposure, traffic and maintenanceCan regenerate under suitable growing conditions but requires continuous care

    These are general differences. Actual performance depends on turf construction, grass species, climate, soil, installation and usage.